ื‘ืกืดื“

Kavanot: Days of Yore

Thoughts on Tanach and the Davening

Weโ€™ve talked about Mosheโ€™s psalms, the perakim of ืชื”ื™ืœื™ื that are attributed to him. There is one other โ€œpsalmโ€ that Moshe wrote, that was explicitly incorporated into the Torah.

ื™ื˜ ื•ืขืชื” ื›ืชื‘ื• ืœื›ื ืืช ื”ืฉื™ืจื” ื”ื–ืืช ื•ืœืžื“ื” ืืช ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ ืฉื™ืžื” ื‘ืคื™ื”ื; ืœืžืขืŸ ืชื”ื™ื” ืœื™ ื”ืฉื™ืจื” ื”ื–ืืช ืœืขื“ ื‘ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœืƒโ€ฆืœ ื•ื™ื“ื‘ืจ ืžืฉื” ื‘ืื–ื ื™ ื›ืœ ืงื”ืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ ืืช ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื”ืฉื™ืจื” ื”ื–ืืช ืขื“ ืชืžืืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ืœื

And I want to look at it because it has many of the same themes as the ืชื”ื™ืœื™ื we looked at (and much of the same vocabulary, though I wonโ€™t spend much time on that). This was inspired by Rav Moshe Eisemannโ€™s Shiras Haโ€™azinu, and I mentioned much of this material in the Parsha shiur ืคืจืฉืช ื”ืื–ื™ื ื• ืชืฉืคืดื“.

ืฉื™ืจืช ื”ืื–ื™ื ื• was Mosheโ€™s last ื ื‘ื•ืื” before his death (the timing of ื•ื–ืืช ื”ื‘ืจื›ื” is a separate question), and it was used as the ืฉื™ืจ of the Leviim for the musaf offering on Shabbat:

ื‘ืžื•ืกืคื™ ืฉื‘ืช ืื•ืžืจื™ื ืฉื™ืจืช โ€ื”ืื–ื™ื ื•โ€œ ื•ื—ื•ืœืงื™ืŸ ืื•ืชื” ืœืฉืฉื” ืคืจืงื™ื ื”ื–ื™ืณืณื• ืœืณืณืš ื›ื“ืจืš ืฉืงื•ืจืื™ืŸ ืื•ืชื” ืฉืฉื” ื‘ื‘ื™ืช ื”ื›ื ืกืช. ื•ืื•ืžืจื™ืŸ ืคืจืง ื‘ื›ืœ ืฉื‘ืช. ื’ืžืจื• ื”ืฉื™ืจื” ื‘ืฉืฉื” ืฉื‘ืชื•ืช ื—ื•ื–ืจื™ืŸ ืœืจืืฉ.

ืžืฉื ื” ืชื•ืจื”, ื”ืœื›ื•ืช ืชืžื™ื“ื™ื ื•ืžื•ืกืคื™ืŸ ื•:ื˜

The mnemonic ื”ื–ื™ืณืณื• ืœืณืณืš refers to the division of the parsha in to six sections, which correspond to the first six aliyot when we read ื”ืื–ื™ื ื• today:

ืจืืฉื•ืŸ ื ื”ืื–ื™ื ื• ื”ืฉืžื™ื ื•ืื“ื‘ืจื”; ื•ืชืฉืžืข ื”ืืจืฅ ืืžืจื™ ืคื™ืƒ ืฉื ื™ ื– ื–ื›ืจ ื™ืžื•ืช ืขื•ืœื ื‘ื™ื ื• ืฉื ื•ืช ื“ืจ ื•ื“ืจ; ืฉืืœ ืื‘ื™ืš ื•ื™ื’ื“ืš ื–ืงื ื™ืš ื•ื™ืืžืจื• ืœืšืƒ ืฉืœื™ืฉื™ ื™ื’ ื™ืจื›ื‘ื”ื• ืขืœ ื‘ืžืชื™ ืืจืฅ ื•ื™ืื›ืœ ืชื ื•ื‘ืช ืฉื“ื™; ื•ื™ื ืงื”ื• ื“ื‘ืฉ ืžืกืœืข ื•ืฉืžืŸ ืžื—ืœืžื™ืฉ ืฆื•ืจืƒ ืจื‘ื™ืขื™ ื™ื˜ ื•ื™ืจื ื”ืณ ื•ื™ื ืืฅ ืžื›ืขืก ื‘ื ื™ื• ื•ื‘ื ืชื™ื•ืƒ ื—ืžื™ืฉื™ ื›ื˜ ืœื• ื—ื›ืžื• ื™ืฉื›ื™ืœื• ื–ืืช; ื™ื‘ื™ื ื• ืœืื—ืจื™ืชืืƒ ืฉื™ืฉื™ ืž ื›ื™ ืืฉื ืืœ ืฉืžื™ื ื™ื“ื™; ื•ืืžืจืชื™ ื—ื™ ืื ื›ื™ ืœืขืœืืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ืœื‘

ืžึดื–ึฐืžื•ึนืจ ืฉืึดื™ืจ ืœึฐื™ื•ึนื ื”ึทืฉืึผึทื‘ึผึธืช, the ืฉื™ืจ for Shabbat morning, is not explicitly about Shabbat but about our hope in ื”ืณโ€˜s ultimate plan for the world. ื”ืื–ื™ื ื• is the ืฉื™ืจ for Shabbat afternoon, and it is also about ื”ืณโ€™s ultimate plan for the world; it ends with (ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ืžื’)โ€Ž ื”ืจื ื™ื ื• ื’ื•ื™ื ืขืžื•โ€ฆื•ื›ืคืจ ืื“ืžืชื• ืขืžื•.

The Aruch Hashulchan wonders why we donโ€™t say it for Shabbat musaf today:

ื•ื’ื ืชืžื™ื” ืœื™ ืฉื‘ืžื•ืกืฃ ืฉื‘ืช ืžื‘ื•ืืจ ื‘ืจืืฉ ื”ืฉื ื” ืฉื ืฉื”ื™ื• ืื•ืžืจื™ื ืฉื™ืจ ืžืคืจืฉืช โ€ื”ืื–ื™ื ื•โ€œโ€ฆื•ืœืžื” ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ืื™ืŸ ืžื™ ืฉื™ืืžืจื? ื•ืฆืขืดื’.

ืขืจื•ืš ื”ืฉื•ืœื—ืŸ, ืื•ืจื— ื—ื™ื™ื ืงืœืดื’:ื’

But itโ€™s still important enough, ืชื”ื™ื” ืœื™ ื”ืฉื™ืจื” ื”ื–ืืช ืœืขื“ ื‘ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ, that itโ€™s worth looking at in detail. It is meant to be with ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ through all the difficult times in their future history.

ื•ืืœื• ื”ื™ืชื” ื”ืฉื™ืจื” ื”ื–ืืช ืžื›ืชื‘ ืื—ื“ ืžืŸ ื”ื—ื•ื–ื™ื ื‘ื›ื•ื›ื‘ื™ื ืฉื”ื’ื™ื“ ืžืจืืฉื™ืช ืื—ืจื™ืช ื›ืŸ ื”ื™ื” ืจืื•ื™ ืœื”ืืžื™ืŸ ื‘ื” ืžืคื ื™ ืฉื ืชืงื™ื™ืžื• ื›ืœ ื“ื‘ืจื™ื” ืขื“ ื”ื ื” ืœื ื ืคืœ ื“ื‘ืจ ืื—ื“ ื•ืืฃ ื›ื™ ืื ื—ื ื• ื ืืžื™ืŸ ื•ื ืฆืคื” ื‘ื›ืœ ืœื‘ ืœื“ื‘ืจื™ ื”ืืœืงื™ื ืžืคื™ ื ื‘ื™ืื• ื”ื ืืžืŸ ื‘ื›ืœ ื‘ื™ืชื• ืืฉืจ ืœื ื”ื™ื” ืœืคื ื™ื• ื•ืื—ืจื™ื• ื›ืžื•ื”ื• ืขืœื™ื• ื”ืฉืœื•ื.

ืจืžื‘ืดืŸ, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ืž

The striking thing about this ืฉื™ืจื” is that itโ€™s not like the rest of the Torah. It isnโ€™t ื”ืณ's words; itโ€™s Mosheโ€™s. ื”ืณ told him (and Yehoshua) ื›ืชื‘ื• ืœื›ื ืืช ื”ืฉื™ืจื” ื”ื–ืืช.

ื›ื– ื›ื™ ืื ื›ื™ ื™ื“ืขืชื™ ืืช ืžืจื™ืš ื•ืืช ืขืจืคืš ื”ืงืฉื”; ื”ืŸ ื‘ืขื•ื“ื ื™ ื—ื™ ืขืžื›ื ื”ื™ื•ื ืžืžืจื™ื ื”ื™ืชื ืขื ื”ืณ ื•ืืฃ ื›ื™ ืื—ืจื™ ืžื•ืชื™ืƒ ื›ื— ื”ืงื”ื™ืœื• ืืœื™ ืืช ื›ืœ ื–ืงื ื™ ืฉื‘ื˜ื™ื›ื ื•ืฉื˜ืจื™ื›ื; ื•ืื“ื‘ืจื” ื‘ืื–ื ื™ื”ื ืืช ื”ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ื”ืืœื” ื•ืืขื™ื“ื” ื‘ื ืืช ื”ืฉืžื™ื ื•ืืช ื”ืืจืฅืƒ ื›ื˜ ื›ื™ ื™ื“ืขืชื™ ืื—ืจื™ ืžื•ืชื™ ื›ื™ ื”ืฉื—ืช ืชืฉื—ืชื•ืŸ ื•ืกืจืชื ืžืŸ ื”ื“ืจืš ืืฉืจ ืฆื•ื™ืชื™ ืืชื›ื; ื•ืงืจืืช ืืชื›ื ื”ืจืขื” ื‘ืื—ืจื™ืช ื”ื™ืžื™ื ื›ื™ ืชืขืฉื• ืืช ื”ืจืข ื‘ืขื™ื ื™ ื”ืณ ืœื”ื›ืขื™ืกื• ื‘ืžืขืฉื” ื™ื“ื™ื›ืืƒ ืœ ื•ื™ื“ื‘ืจ ืžืฉื” ื‘ืื–ื ื™ ื›ืœ ืงื”ืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ ืืช ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื”ืฉื™ืจื” ื”ื–ืืช ืขื“ ืชืžืืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ืœื

ื“ื›ื‘ืจ ื ืชื‘ืืจ ื“ื‘ืฉื™ืจืช ื”ืื–ื™ื ื• ืœื ื”ื™ืชื” ื”ืฉื›ื™ื ื” ืžื“ื‘ืจืช ื‘ืงืจื‘ื• ื•ืขืดื› ืœื ืงืจื ื”ืฉื™ืจื” ืืœื ืžืกืดืช.

ื”ืขืžืง ื“ื‘ืจ, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื’:ื

ื•ื›ืืŸ ืฉื”ื™ื” ืกื•ืฃ ื™ืžื™ื• ืฉืœ ืžืฉื” ื•ื ืกืชื ืžืžื ื• ืžืขื™ื™ืŸ ื”ื—ื›ืžื” ื›ืžื‘ื•ืืจ ื‘ืžื“ืจืฉโ€ฆื•ื‘ื–ื” ืชื‘ื™ืŸ ื“ื‘ืจ ื ืคืœื ืœืžื” ื‘ืฉื™ืจืช ื”ืื–ื™ื ื• ื ื‘ื™ืื•ืช ืžืฉื” ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ืกืชื•ืžื” ืžืื•ื“ ืฉืœื ืžืฆื™ื ื• ื›ื–ืืช ื‘ื›ืœ ื”ืชื•ืจื”. ื›ื™ ื”ืขื ื™ืŸ ื›ืš ื”ื•ื, ืฉื ื‘ื•ืืช ืžืฉื” ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ื”ื™ื” ื‘ืืกืคืงืœืจื™ื ื”ืžืื™ืจื” ื•ื›ืœ ื”ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื‘ืืกืคืงืœืจื™ื ืฉืื™ื ื” ืžืื™ืจื” ื•ืœื›ืš ื ื‘ื•ืืชื• ืฉืœ ืžืฉื” ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ืฉื”ื™ื” ื‘ืืกืคืงืœืจื™ื ื”ืžืื™ืจื” ื”ื™ื” ืœื• ื›ื— ื’ื“ื•ืœ ืฉื™ืืžืจ ื”ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ื›ืžื• ืฉืงื‘ืœ ืžื”ืฉื ื™ืชื‘ืจืš ื‘ืœื™ ืฉื•ื ื”ืชืœื‘ืฉื•ืช ื‘ื“ืจืš ืžืฉืœ ื•ื—ื™ื“ื”, ืžื” ืฉืื™ืŸ ื›ืŸ ืฉืืจ ื”ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ืฉืœื ื”ื™ื” ืœื”ื ื›ื— ืฉืœ ืžืฉื” ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ื”ื™ื• ืฆืจื™ื›ื™ื ืœื”ืœื‘ื™ืฉ ื ื‘ื•ืืชื ื“ืจืš ืžืฉืœ ื•ื—ื™ื“ื” ื›ืžื• ื ื‘ื•ืื•ืช ื–ื›ืจื™ื” ื•ืฉืืจ ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ืฉืกืชื•ืžื™ื ืžืื“ ื•ื–ื• ื ืงืจื ืืกืคืงืœืจื™ื ืฉืื™ื ื” ืžืื™ืจื”. ื•ื”ื ื” ืงื•ื“ื ื”ืกืชืœืงื•ืชื• ืฉืœ ืžืฉื” ืจื‘ื™ื ื• ืขืดื” ื ื™ื˜ืœื” ืžืกื•ืจืช ื”ื—ื›ืžื” ืžืžื ื• ื•ื ื™ืชื ื” ืœื™ื”ื•ืฉืข, ื•ืœื›ืš ืฉื™ืจืช ื”ืื–ื™ื ื• ื”ื™ื ืกืชื•ืžื” ื‘ื“ืจืš ื”ืชืœื‘ืฉื•ืช.

ืงื“ื•ืฉืช ืœื•ื™, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื, ื•ื™ืœืš

ื ื”ืื–ื™ื ื• ื”ืฉืžื™ื ื•ืื“ื‘ืจื”; ื•ืชืฉืžืข ื”ืืจืฅ ืืžืจื™ ืคื™ืƒ

ื‘ ื™ืขืจืฃ ื›ืžื˜ืจ ืœืงื—ื™ ืชื–ืœ ื›ื˜ืœ ืืžืจืชื™

ื›ืฉืขื™ืจื ืขืœื™ ื“ืฉื ื•ื›ืจื‘ื™ื‘ื™ื ืขืœื™ ืขืฉื‘ืƒ

ื’ ื›ื™ ืฉื ื”ืณ ืืงืจื; ื”ื‘ื• ื’ื“ืœ ืœืืœืงื™ื ื•ืƒ

ื“ ื”ืฆื•ืจ ืชืžื™ื ืคืขืœื• ื›ื™ ื›ืœ ื“ืจื›ื™ื• ืžืฉืคื˜;

ืึพืœ ืืžื•ื ื” ื•ืื™ืŸ ืขื•ืœ ืฆื“ื™ืง ื•ื™ืฉืจ ื”ื•ืืƒ

ื” ืฉื—ืช ืœื• ืœื ื‘ื ื™ื• ืžื•ืžื; ื“ื•ืจ ืขืงืฉ ื•ืคืชืœืชืœืƒ

ื• ื”ืœื”ืณ ืชื’ืžืœื• ื–ืืช ืขื ื ื‘ืœ ื•ืœื ื—ื›ื;

ื”ืœื•ื ื”ื•ื ืื‘ื™ืš ืงื ืš ื”ื•ื ืขืฉืš ื•ื™ื›ื ื ืšืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ืœื‘

Moshe starts by addressing, not the people, but his โ€œwitnessesโ€: the heaven and the earth. As we noted in The King and I, those represent the two models of ืขื‘ื•ื“ืช ื”ืณ:

(ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ื) ื”ืื–ื™ื ื• ื”ืฉืžื™ื [ื•ืื“ื‘ืจื”; ื•ืชืฉืžืข ื”ืืจืฅ ืืžืจื™ ืคื™]: ืืžืจ ืœื• ื”ืงื‘ืดื” ืœืžืฉื”: ืืžื•ืจ ืœื”ื ืœื™ืฉืจืืœ, ื”ืกืชื›ืœื• ื‘ืฉืžื™ื ืฉื‘ืจืืชื™โ€ฆืฉืฉืžื— ืœืขืฉื•ืช ืจืฆื•ื ื™ ืฉื ืืžืจ (ืชื”ืœื™ื ื™ื˜:ื•) ื•ึฐื”ื•ึผื ื›ึฐึผื—ึธืชึธืŸ ื™ึนืฆึตื ืžึตื—ึปืคึธึผืชื•ึน [ื™ึธืฉึดื‚ื™ืฉื‚ ื›ึฐึผื’ึดื‘ึผื•ึนืจ ืœึธืจื•ึผืฅ ืึนืจึทื—]โ€ฆ

ื•ืชืฉืžืข ื”ืืจืฅ ืืžืจื™ ืคื™: ื”ืกืชื›ืœื• ื‘ืืจืฅ ืฉื‘ืจืืชื™ ืœืฉืžืฉื›ื ืฉืžื ืฉื™ื ืชื” ืืช ืžื“ืชื” ืฉืžื ื–ืจืขืชื ื•ืœื ืฆืžื—ื”โ€ฆื•ื›ืŸ ืœืขื ื™ืŸ ื”ื™ื ื”ื•ื ืื•ืžืจ (ื™ืจืžื™ื” ื”:ื›ื‘) ื”ึทืื•ึนืชึดื™ ืœึนื ืชึดื™ืจึธืื•ึผ ื ึฐืึปื ื”ืณ ืึดื ืžึดืคึผึธื ึทื™ ืœึนื ืชึธื—ึดื™ืœื•ึผ ืึฒืฉืึถืจ ืฉื‚ึทืžึฐืชึผึดื™ ื—ื•ึนืœ ื’ึผึฐื‘ื•ึผืœ ืœึทื™ึผึธื, ืฉืžืฉืขื” ืฉื’ื–ืจืชื™ ืขืœื™ื• ืฉืžื ืฉื™ื ื” ืืช ืžื“ืชื• ื•ืืžืจ ืืขืœื” ื•ืืฆื™ืฃ ืืช ื”ืขื•ืœื?โ€ฆื•ืœื ืขื•ื“ ืืœื ืฉืžืฆื˜ืขืจ ื•ืื™ืŸ ื™ื›ื•ืœ ืžื” ืœืขืฉื•ืช, ื›ืขื ื™ืŸ ืฉื ืืžืจ ื•ึทื™ึผึดืชึฐื’ึผึธืขึฒืฉืื•ึผ ื•ึฐืœึนื ื™ื•ึผื›ึธืœื•ึผ.

ื™ืœืงื•ื˜ ืฉืžืขื•ื ื™ ืขืœ ื”ืชื•ืจื” ืชืชืงืžืดื‘

ื”ืฉืžื™ื โ€œservesโ€ ื”ืณ with ืื”ื‘ื”, and ืืจืฅ โ€œservesโ€ ื”ืณ with ื™ืจืื”. Both are inseparable parts of our relationship with ื”ืงื‘ืดื”. Yeshaya uses a similar metaphor:

ืฉืึดืžึฐืขื•ึผ ืฉืึธืžึทื™ึดื ื•ึฐื”ึทืึฒื–ึดื™ื ึดื™ ืึถืจึถืฅ ื›ึผึดื™ ื”ืณ ื“ึผึดื‘ึผึตืจ; ื‘ึผึธื ึดื™ื ื’ึผึดื“ึผึทืœึฐืชึผึดื™ ื•ึฐืจื•ึนืžึทืžึฐืชึผึดื™ ื•ึฐื”ึตื ืคึผึธืฉืึฐืขื•ึผ ื‘ึดื™ืƒ

ื™ืฉืขื™ื” ื:ื‘

But he exchanges the ืฉืžื™ืขื” and the ื”ืื–ื™ื ื”. The Ohr HaChaim says that this reflects the fact that Moshe is, even as the greatest of all prophets, still only human.

ื”ื ื” ื”ื“ืจืš ืฉืื ื• ืžื™ืฉื‘ื™ื ื‘ื• ื›ืœ ื”ื“ืงื“ื•ืงื™ื ื”ื•ื ืขืœ ื–ื” ื”ื“ืจืš, ืœืคื™ ืฉื”ืฉืžื™ื ื”ื ืขืœื™ื•ื ื™ื ื›ืคืฉื˜ ื”ืขื ื™ืŸ ืœื–ื” ืงืจื ืœื”ื ืžืฉื” ืฉื™ื˜ื• ืื–ื ื ื•ืืžืจ ืœื”ื ื”ืื–ื™ื ื• ืคื™ืจื•ืฉ ื”ื˜ื• ืื–ื ื›ื ืœืฉืžื•ืข ื“ื‘ืจื™, ื•ืœืืจืฅ ืืžืจ ื•ืชืฉืžืข ืคื™ืจื•ืฉ ืžืขืฆืžื” ื‘ืœื ื”ื˜ื™ื™ืช ืื•ื–ืŸ ื›ื™ ืœืคื ื™ื• ื”ื™ื ืขื•ืžื“ืช ื•ื™ื›ื•ืœื” ืœืฉืžื•ืข ื—ื™ืชื•ืš ื”ืžืืžืจ ื”ื™ื•ืฆื ืžืคื™ื•, ื•ื”ื•ื ืื•ืžืจื• ืืžืจื™ ืคื™ ืœื”ื™ื•ืชื” ื›ืœ ื›ืš ืงืจื•ื‘ื” ืืฆืœื•.

ื•ืœื“ืจืš ื–ื” ื™ืชื™ื™ืฉื‘ื• ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื™ืฉืขื™ื” ืฉืืžืจ โ€ืฉืžืขื• ืฉืžื™ื ื•ื”ืื–ื™ื ื™ ืืจืฅโ€œ, ืฉื ืชืŸ ืฉืžื™ืขื” ืœืฉืžื™ื ื”ื’ื ืฉื”ื ืจื—ื•ืงื™ื ืžืžื ื• ื•ื”ืื–ื ื” ืœืืจืฅ ื”ื’ื ืฉื”ื™ื ืงืจื•ื‘ื”, ื”ื˜ืขื ื”ื•ื ื›ืžื• ืฉื’ืžืจ ืื•ืžืจ ื™ืฉืขื™ื” ืขืฆืžื• ื•ืืžืจ โ€ื›ื™ ื”ืณ ื“ื‘ืจโ€œ; ืคื™ืจื•ืฉ ื˜ืขื ืฉืืžืจ ื‘ืกื“ืจ ื–ื” ืœื”ื ื›ื™ ื”ืณ ื“ื‘ืจ ื•ื‘ืขืจืš ื”ืžื“ื‘ืจ ืฉื”ื•ื ื”ืงื“ื•ืฉ ื‘ืจื•ืš ื”ื•ื, ื™ื•ืชืจ ื”ื ืงืจื•ื‘ื™ื ื”ืฉืžื™ื ื“ื›ืชื™ื‘โ€ฆ(ื™ืฉืขื™ื” ืกื•:ื) ื”ึทืฉึธึผืืžึทื™ึดื ื›ึดึผืกึฐืึดื™ ื•ึฐื”ึธืึธืจึถืฅ ื”ึฒื“ึนื ืจึทื’ึฐืœึธื™.

ืื•ืจ ื”ื—ื™ื™ื, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ื

Moshe compares his words to rain; the metaphor of Torah as water is very common:

ื›ืžื˜ืจ: ืžื” ืžื˜ืจ ื—ื™ื™ื ืœืขื•ืœื, ืืฃ ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ืจื” ื—ื™ื™ื ืœืขื•ืœื.

ืกืคืจื™ ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืฉืดื•

ื•ื™ืกืข ืžืฉื” ืืช ื™ืฉืจืืœ ืžื™ื ืกื•ืฃ ื•ื™ืฆืื• ืืœ ืžื“ื‘ืจ ืฉื•ืจ; ื•ื™ืœื›ื• ืฉืœืฉืช ื™ืžื™ื ื‘ืžื“ื‘ืจ ื•ืœื ืžืฆืื• ืžื™ืืƒ

ืฉืžื•ืช ื˜ื•:ื›ื‘

ื“ื•ืจืฉื™ ืจืฉื•ืžื•ืช ืืžืจื•: ื•ืœื ืžืฆืื• ืžื™ืโ€”ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ืจื” ืฉื ืžืฉืœื• ืœืžื™ื. ื•ืžื ื™ืŸ ืฉื ืžืฉืœื• ืœืžื™ื? ืฉื ืืžืจ: (ื™ืฉืขื™ื” ื ื”:ื) ื”ื•ึนื™ ื›ึผื‡ืœ ืฆึธืžึตื ืœึฐื›ื•ึผ ืœึทืžึผึทื™ึดื. ืœืคื™ ืฉืคืจืฉื• ืžื“ื‘ืจื™ ืชื•ืจื” ืฉืœื•ืฉืช ื™ืžื™ื, ืœื›ืš ืžืจื“ื•. ื•ืœื›ืš ื”ืชืงื™ื ื• ืœื”ื ื”ื ื‘ื™ืื™ื ื•ื”ื–ืงื ื™ื ืฉื™ื”ื™ื• ืงื•ืจื™ืŸ ื‘ืชื•ืจื” ื‘ืฉื‘ืช ื‘ืฉื ื™ ื•ื‘ื—ืžื™ืฉื™.

ืžื›ื™ืœืชื ื“ืจื‘ื™ ื™ืฉืžืขืืœ ื‘ืฉืœื—โ€”ืžืกื›ืชื ื“ื•ื™ืกืข ืคืจืฉื” ื

ื™ ื›ื™ ื›ืืฉืจ ื™ืจื“ ื”ื’ืฉื ื•ื”ืฉืœื’ ืžืŸ ื”ืฉืžื™ื ื•ืฉืžื” ืœื ื™ืฉื•ื‘ ื›ื™ ืื ื”ืจื•ื” ืืช ื”ืืจืฅ ื•ื”ื•ืœื™ื“ื” ื•ื”ืฆืžื™ื—ื”; ื•ื ืชืŸ ื–ืจืข ืœื–ืจืข ื•ืœื—ื ืœืื›ืœืƒ ื™ื ื›ืŸ ื™ื”ื™ื” ื“ื‘ืจื™ ืืฉืจ ื™ืฆื ืžืคื™ ืœื ื™ืฉื•ื‘ ืืœื™ ืจื™ืงื; ื›ื™ ืื ืขืฉื” ืืช ืืฉืจ ื—ืคืฆืชื™ ื•ื”ืฆืœื™ื— ืืฉืจ ืฉืœื—ืชื™ื•ืƒ

ื™ืฉืขื™ื”ื• ืคืจืง ื ื”

But there is more than that. Moshe does not say โ€œืชื–ืœ ื›ื˜ืœ ืืžืจืช ื”ืณโ€; he says โ€œืชื–ืœ ื›ื˜ืœ ืืžืจืชื™โ€. The Word of G-d may be like life-giving water, but it does not fall like rain or dew. We talked about this in ืฉืžื—ืช ืชื•ืจื” ืชืฉืคืดื‘:

ื ื•ึฐื–ึนืืช ื”ึทื‘ึผึฐืจึธื›ึธื” ืึฒืฉืึถืจ ื‘ึผึตืจึทืšึฐ ืžึนืฉืึถื” ืึดื™ืฉื ื”ึธืึฑืœึนืงึดื™ื ืึถืช ื‘ึผึฐื ึตื™ ื™ึดืฉื‚ึฐืจึธืึตืœ; ืœึดืคึฐื ึตื™ ืžื•ึนืชื•ึนืƒ ื‘ ื•ึทื™ึผึนืืžึทืจ ื”ืณ ืžึดืกึผึดื™ื ึทื™ ื‘ึผึธื ื•ึฐื–ึธืจึทื— ืžึดืฉึผื‚ึตืขึดื™ืจ ืœึธืžื•ึน ื”ื•ึนืคึดื™ืขึท ืžึตื”ึทืจ ืคึผึธืืจึธืŸ ื•ึฐืึธืชึธื” ืžึตืจึดื‘ึฐื‘ึนืช ืงึนื“ึถืฉื; ืžึดื™ืžึดื™ื ื•ึน ืืฉื“ืช (ืึตืฉื ื“ึผึธืช) ืœึธืžื•ึนืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ืœื’

What is an ืืฉื“ืช? Everyone reads it like the ืงืจื™, as two words. Artscroll translates it as โ€œfiery Torahโ€. But the ื›ืชื™ื‘ still must have meaning. The only suggestion Iโ€™ve seen was from the Mi Yodea website:

Based on the kโ€™siv, in which โ€œืืฉื“ืชโ€ is only one word, I have heard it being related to the independent word ืืฉื“ืช, meaning waterfall, as in โ€œืชื—ืช ืืฉื“ืช ื”ืคืกื’ื”โ€. (Dโ€™varim 4:49)

Mi Yodea user WAF

ื•ึฐื”ึธืขึฒืจึธื‘ึธื” ื•ึฐื”ึทื™ึทึผืจึฐื“ึตึผืŸ ื•ึผื’ึฐื‘ึปืœ; ืžึดื›ึดึผื ึถึผืจึถืช ื•ึฐืขึทื“ ื™ึธื ื”ึธืขึฒืจึธื‘ึธื” ื™ึธื ื”ึทืžึถึผืœึทื— ืชึทึผื—ึทืช ืึทืฉึฐืื“ึนึผืช ื”ึทืคึดึผืกึฐื’ึธึผื” ืžึดื–ึฐืจึธื—ึธื”ืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ื’:ื™ื–

ืžื– ื•ึทื™ึผึดื™ืจึฐืฉืื•ึผ ืึถืช ืึทืจึฐืฆื•ึน ื•ึฐืึถืช ืึถืจึถืฅ ืขื•ึนื’ ืžึถืœึถืšึฐ ื”ึทื‘ึผึธืฉืึธืŸ ืฉืึฐื ึตื™ ืžึทืœึฐื›ึตื™ ื”ึธืึฑืžึนืจึดื™ ืึฒืฉืึถืจ ื‘ึผึฐืขึตื‘ึถืจ ื”ึทื™ึผึทืจึฐื“ึผึตืŸ ืžึดื–ึฐืจึทื— ืฉืึธืžึถืฉืืƒ ืžื— ืžึตืขึฒืจึนืขึตืจ ืึฒืฉืึถืจ ืขึทืœ ืฉื‚ึฐืคึทืช ื ึทื—ึทืœ ืึทืจึฐื ึนืŸ ื•ึฐืขึทื“ ื”ึทืจ ืฉื‚ึดื™ืึนืŸ ื”ื•ึผื ื—ึถืจึฐืžื•ึนืŸืƒ ืžื˜ ื•ึฐื›ึธืœ ื”ึธืขึฒืจึธื‘ึธื” ืขึตื‘ึถืจ ื”ึทื™ึผึทืจึฐื“ึผึตืŸ ืžึดื–ึฐืจึธื—ึธื” ื•ึฐืขึทื“ ื™ึธื ื”ึธืขึฒืจึธื‘ึธื” ืชึผึทื—ึทืช ืึทืฉืึฐื“ึผึนืช ื”ึทืคึผึดืกึฐื’ึผึธื”ืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ื“

So when ื”ืณ speaks to the people directly at ื”ืจ ืกื™ื ื™, it is like ืึทืฉึฐืื“ึนึผืช, like trying to drink from a firehose. The people canโ€™t handle it. They need Moshe as an intermediary, to turn the flow of metaphoric water into individual drops of rain.

And then Moshe turns to the people and asks them to participate in his song:

ื›ื™ ืฉื ื”ืณ ืืงืจื:โ€ฆื›ืฉืืงืจื ื•ืื–ื›ื™ืจ ืฉื ื”ืณ, ืืชื ื”ื‘ื• ื’ื“ืœ ืœืืœืงื™ื ื• ื•ื‘ืจื›ื• ืฉืžื•.

ืจืฉืดื™, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ื’

And the gemara draws an interesting conclusion from that pasuk:

ืžื ื™ืŸ ืœื‘ืจื›ืช ื”ืชื•ืจื” ืœืคื ื™ื” ืžืŸ ื”ืชื•ืจื”? ืฉื ืืžืจ โ€ื›ื™ ืฉื ื”ืณ ืืงืจื ื”ื‘ื• ื’ื“ืœ ืœืืœืงื™ื ื•โ€œ.

ื‘ืจื›ื•ืช ื›ื,ื

The gemara sees this song as the prototype of learning Torah; specifically ื‘ื—ื‘ืจื•ืชื, learning together. Moshe is not simply lecturing; he is starting a dialog with the people, trying to understand the ways of ื”ืณ together.

But Moshe is still ืžืฉื” ืจื‘ื™ื ื•, and he still lectures. He turns to ื”ืณ's justice, and makes a point very similar to ืชื”ื™ืœื™ื ืคืจืง ืฆื‘ and ืคืจืง ืฆื“, as we discussed in Days of Yore. Those perakim were also written by Moshe, and he is in harsh schoolmaster mode:

ื– ืื™ืฉ ื‘ืขืจ ืœื ื™ื“ืข; ื•ื›ืกื™ืœ ืœื ื™ื‘ื™ืŸ ืืช ื–ืืชืƒ ื— ื‘ืคืจื— ืจืฉืขื™ื ื›ืžื• ืขืฉื‘ ื•ื™ืฆื™ืฆื• ื›ืœ ืคืขืœื™ ืื•ืŸ; ืœื”ืฉืžื“ื ืขื“ื™ ืขื“ืƒ

ืชื”ื™ืœื™ื ืคืจืง ืฆื‘

ื— ื‘ื™ื ื• ื‘ืขืจื™ื ื‘ืขื; ื•ื›ืกื™ืœื™ื ืžืชื™ ืชืฉื›ื™ืœื•ืƒ ื˜ ื”ื ื˜ืข ืื–ืŸ ื”ืœื ื™ืฉืžืข; ืื ื™ืฆืจ ืขื™ืŸ ื”ืœื ื™ื‘ื™ื˜ืƒ ื™ ื”ื™ืกืจ ื’ื•ื™ื ื”ืœื ื™ื•ื›ื™ื—; ื”ืžืœืžื“ ืื“ื ื“ืขืชืƒ

ืชื”ื™ืœื™ื ืคืจืง ืฆื“

He concludes this introductory section reminding the people that ืื‘ื™ืš ืงื ืš, your Father and โ€œOwnerโ€. We see the metaphor of ืื‘ all the time, but what does it mean that ื”ืณ is a ืงื•ื ื”? That term is applied in ืชื ืดืš to only four things:

ืืจื‘ืขื” ืงื ื™ื ื™ืŸ ืฉืงื ื™ืชื™ ื‘ืขื•ืœืžื™. ืชื•ืจื” ืงื ื™ืŸ ืื—ื“, ื“ื›ืชื™ื‘ (ืžืฉืœื™ ื›ื‘:ื—): ื”ืณ ืงึธื ึธื ึดื™ ืจึตืืฉืึดื™ืช ื“ึผึทืจึฐื›ึผื•ึน. ืฉืžื™ื ื•ืืจืฅ ืงื ื™ืŸ ืื—ื“, ื“ื›ืชื™ื‘ (ื‘ืจืืฉื™ืช ื™ื“:ื™ื˜): ืงึนื ึตื” ืฉืึธืžึทื™ึดื ื•ึธืึธืจึถืฅ. ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ ืงื ื™ืŸ ืื—ื“, ื“ื›ืชื™ื‘ (ืชื”ื™ืœื™ื ืขื—:ื ื“): ื”ึทืจ ื–ึถื” ืงึธื ึฐืชึธื” ื™ึฐืžึดื™ื ื•ึน. ื™ืฉืจืืœ ืงื ื™ืŸ ืื—ื“ ื“ื›ืชื™ื‘ (ืฉืžื•ืช ื˜ื•:ื˜ื–): ืขึทื ื–ื•ึผ ืงึธื ึดื™ืชึธ.

ืคืกื—ื™ื ืคื–,ื‘

The Ktav VeKabbalah says we are mistraslating ืงื•ื ื”. Itโ€™s not from ืงื ื™ืŸ, but from ืชืงื ื”.

ืงื ื” ืฉืžื™ื ื•ืืจืฅ: ื›ืžื• ืขื•ืฉื” ืฉืžื™ื ื•ืืจืฅ ืขืดื™ ืขืฉื™ื™ืชืŸ ืงื ืืŸ ืœื”ื™ื•ืช ืฉืœื• (ืจืฉืดื™)โ€ฆื•ืœืดื  ืžืœืช ืงื ื” ื”ื•ื ืœืฉื•ืŸ ืชื™ืงื•ืŸ ืกื“ื•ืจ ื”ื™ืฉืจื” ื•ื”ื›ื ื”โ€ฆื•ื›ืฉื ืชืงื ื” ื‘ืจื‘ื•ืชื™ื ื•โ€ฆืœื”ื›ื ื” ื•ื’ื“ืจ ืฉืœื ื™ื‘ื ืœื™ื“ื™ ืงืœืงื•ืœ.

ื”ื›ืชื‘ ื•ื”ืงื‘ืœื”, ื‘ืจืืฉื™ืช ื™ื“:ื™ื˜

The message is that while ื”ืณ created everything, ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ took special, โ€œpersonalโ€, preparation to reach their current state.


Rabbi Eisemann says that the previous aliyah was an introduction, and with the second aliyah we get to the song proper. He calls this โ€œHaโ€™azinuโ€™s Historiographyโ€.

ื– ื–ื›ืจ ื™ืžื•ืช ืขื•ืœื ื‘ื™ื ื• ืฉื ื•ืช ื“ืจ ื•ื“ืจ; ืฉืืœ ืื‘ื™ืš ื•ื™ื’ื“ืš ื–ืงื ื™ืš ื•ื™ืืžืจื• ืœืšืƒ

ื— ื‘ื”ื ื—ืœ ืขืœื™ื•ืŸ ื’ื•ื™ื ื‘ื”ืคืจื™ื“ื• ื‘ื ื™ ืื“ื;

ื™ืฆื‘ ื’ื‘ืœืช ืขืžื™ื ืœืžืกืคืจ ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœืƒ

ื˜ ื›ื™ ื—ืœืง ื”ืณ ืขืžื•; ื™ืขืงื‘ ื—ื‘ืœ ื ื—ืœืชื•ืƒ

ื™ ื™ืžืฆืื”ื• ื‘ืืจืฅ ืžื“ื‘ืจ ื•ื‘ืชื”ื• ื™ืœืœ ื™ืฉืžืŸ;

ื™ืกื‘ื‘ื ื”ื• ื™ื‘ื•ื ื ื”ื• ื™ืฆืจื ื”ื• ื›ืื™ืฉื•ืŸ ืขื™ื ื•ืƒ

ื™ื ื›ื ืฉืจ ื™ืขื™ืจ ืงื ื• ืขืœ ื’ื•ื–ืœื™ื• ื™ืจื—ืฃ; ื™ืคืจืฉ ื›ื ืคื™ื• ื™ืงื—ื”ื• ื™ืฉืื”ื• ืขืœ ืื‘ืจืชื•ืƒ

ื™ื‘ ื”ืณ ื‘ื“ื“ ื™ื ื—ื ื•; ื•ืื™ืŸ ืขืžื• ืึพืœ ื ื›ืจืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ืœื‘

We can feel very confident in asserting that Haโ€™azinu is a tract that, in one way or another, is teaching us history. There appears to be the assumption that knowledge of who we are, where we come from, and where we are heading can help to salve the inevitable pain that we will meet alond the way.

Rav Moshe Eisemann, Shiras Haโ€™azinu, p. 66

History starts with ื”ืคืจื™ื“ื• ื‘ื ื™ ืื“ื, when the undifferentiated mass of humanity became separate nations. That is the story of ืžื’ื“ืœ ื‘ื‘ืœ:

ื ื•ื™ื”ื™ ื›ืœ ื”ืืจืฅ ืฉืคื” ืื—ืช ื•ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืื—ื“ื™ืืƒโ€ฆื– ื”ื‘ื” ื ืจื“ื” ื•ื ื‘ืœื” ืฉื ืฉืคืชื ืืฉืจ ืœื ื™ืฉืžืขื• ืื™ืฉ ืฉืคืช ืจืขื”ื•ืƒ ื— ื•ื™ืคืฅ ื”ืณ ืืชื ืžืฉื ืขืœ ืคื ื™ ื›ืœ ื”ืืจืฅ; ื•ื™ื—ื“ืœื• ืœื‘ื ืช ื”ืขื™ืจืƒ

ื‘ืจืืฉื™ืช ืคืจืง ื™ื

Weโ€™ve talked about Migdal Bavel as a response to the chaos of the flood, in ืคืจืฉืช ื ื— ืชืฉืขืดื˜โ€Ž ; ืฉืคื” ืื—ืช ื•ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืื—ื“ื™ื meant they all worked in unity for a common purpose. But it went to far, into fascism, โ€œEverything within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the stateโ€.

โ€ฆื•ื’ื ืงื•ื“ื ื–ืžืŸ ื”ื”ืคืœื’ื” ื”ื™ื• ื‘ืขื•ืœื ื›ืขื™ืŸ ืฉื‘ืขื™ื ืœืฉื•ืŸ ื›ื“ื›ืชื™ื‘ (ื‘ืจืืฉื™ืช ื™:ื›) ืœึฐืžึดืฉืึฐืคึผึฐื—ึนืชึธื ืœึดืœึฐืฉืึนื ึนืชึธื,ืืœื ืขืœ ื™ื“ื™ ื’ื•ื“ืœ ื”ืื—ื“ื•ืช ืฉืฉืจื” ื‘ื™ื ื™ื”ื ื”ื‘ื™ืŸ ื›ืœ ืื—ื“ ื›ื•ื•ื ืชื• ื•ืจืฆื•ื ื• ืฉืœ ื—ื‘ื™ืจื•, ื›ืžื• โ€ืฉืคืชโ€œ ื”ืชื™ื ื•ืง ืฉืžื•ื‘ื ืช ืœื”ื•ืจื™ื•โ€ฆื•ื”ื ื” ืขืœ ื™ื“ื™ ื”ืชืื—ื“ื•ืชื ื ืชื”ื•ื• ื›ืžืฉืคื—ื” ืื—ืช ื’ื“ื•ืœื”, ื•ื ืคืœื” ืขืฆื” ื‘ื™ื ื™ื”ื ืฉื›ืœ ืื—ื“ ื™ืงื“ื™ืฉ ื›ืœ ืžืขืฉื™ื• ื•ืคืขื•ืœื•ืชื™ื• ืœื˜ื•ื‘ืช ื”ื›ืœืœโ€ฆื•ืชื•ืฆืืช ื”ื’ื™ืขื ืœืฉื™ื ืคืกื’ืช ื”ืื—ื“ื•ืช ื”ืœื– ื”ื™ืชื” ื”ืžืจื™ื“ื” ื‘ื”ืงื‘ืดื”, ืฉื—ืฉื‘ื• ืฉืื™ืŸ ืœื”ื ืฉื•ื ืฆื•ืจืš ื‘ืขื‘ื•ื“ืช ื”ืณ ื•ืœืฉืžื•ืข ื‘ืงื•ืœื•, ืฉืขืœ ื™ื“ื™ ื”ืฉื•ืชืคื•ืช ืฉืœ ื›ืœ ื‘ื ื™ ืื“ื ื™ืฉ ืœืืœ ื™ื“ื ืœื”ืชื’ื‘ืจ ืขืœ ื›ืœ ืฆืจื” ืฉืœื ืชื‘ื•ืโ€ฆ

ืจื‘ ืฉืžืขื•ืŸ ืฉื•ื•ืื‘, ืžืขื™ืŸ ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืฉื•ืื‘ื”, ื ื— ื™ื:ื

And the number of those primordial nations is exactly the same as the number of families in ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ,โ€Ž ืœืžืกืคืจ ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ:

ื•ื™ื”ื™ ื›ืœ ื ืคืฉ ื™ืฆืื™ ื™ืจืš ื™ืขืงื‘ ืฉื‘ืขื™ื ื ืคืฉ; ื•ื™ื•ืกืฃ ื”ื™ื” ื‘ืžืฆืจื™ืืƒ

ืฉืžื•ืช ื:ื”

Haazinu sees ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ as a model of how all humanity is supposed to operate; not the chaos of ื“ื•ืจ ื”ืžื‘ื•ืœ and not the fascism of ื“ื•ืจ ื”ืคืœื’ื”. Every person is unique but all people are united. So when ื”ืณ brings them to ื”ืจ ืกื™ื ื™, they act out that model:

ื•ื™ื—ืŸ ืฉื ื™ืฉืจืืœ: ื›ืื™ืฉ ืื—ื“ ื‘ืœื‘ ืื—ื“.

ืจืฉืดื™, ืฉืžื•ืช ื™ื˜:ื‘

(It would be nice if we could stick to that model)

And in that wilderness where ื”ืณ โ€findsโ€œ us, ื™ืžืฆืื”ื• ื‘ืืจืฅ ืžื“ื‘ืจ, as a rag-tag mass of freed slaves, He makes us into a people by giving us the Torah. But He doesnโ€™t offer it to just us.

ืขืœ ื’ื•ื–ืœื™ื• ื™ืจื—ืฃ:โ€ฆื›ืฉื‘ื ืœืชืŸ ืชื•ืจื” ืœื ื ื’ืœื” ืขืœื™ื”ื ืžืจื•ื— ืื—ืช ืืœื ืžืืจื‘ืข ืจื•ื—ื•ืช, ืฉื ืืžืจ (ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื’:) ื”ืณ ืžึดืกึผึดื™ื ึทื™ ื‘ึผึธื ื•ึฐื–ึธืจึทื— ืžึดืฉื‚ึผึตืขึดื™ืจ ืœึธืžื•ึน ื”ื•ึนืคึดื™ืขึท ืžึตื”ึทืจ ืคึผึธืืจึธืŸ.

ืจืฉืดื™, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ื™ื

ื•ื–ืจื— ืžืฉืขื™ืจ ืœืžื•: ืฉืคืชื— ืœื‘ื ื™ ืขืฉื• ืฉื™ืงื‘ืœื• ืืช ื”ืชื•ืจื” ื•ืœื ืจืฆื•.

ื”ื•ืคื™ืข ืžื”ืจ ืคืืจืŸ: ืฉื”ืœืš ืฉื ื•ืคืชื— ืœื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืžืขืืœ ืฉื™ืงื‘ืœื•ื” ื•ืœื ืจืฆื•.

ืจืฉืดื™, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื’:ื‘

But the other nations reject the Torah. We know the aggadah; itโ€™s not so that they want to worship other gods, but that they want to serve other values (they like their theft and their murder). So ื”ืณ ends up ื”ืณ ื‘ื“ื“ ื™ื ื—ื ื•, leading them alone (โ€œaloneโ€ refers to Israel rather than ื”ืงื‘ืดื”) because ืื™ืŸ ืขืžื• ืึพืœ ื ื›ืจ, they accepted Him alone. We will see that ืืœ ื ื›ืจ is much broader than other gods. ืžืขืžื“ ื”ืจ ืกื™ื ื™ should have been an opportunity to bring the world back together. In that sense, it was a failure.

ืžืื™ ื”ืจ ืกื™ื ื™? ื”ืจ ืฉื™ืจื“ื” ืฉื ืื” ืœืื•ืžื•ืช ื”ืขื•ืœื ืขืœื™ื•.

ืฉื‘ืช ืคื˜,ื

But here we are: ื”ืณ loves ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ because they fulfill the mission that was intended for all of humanity.


But then every thing goes wrong.

ื™ื’ ื™ืจื›ื‘ื”ื• ืขืœ ื‘ืžื•ืชื™ ืืจืฅ ื•ื™ืื›ืœ ืชื ื•ื‘ืช ืฉื“ื™;

ื•ื™ื ืงื”ื• ื“ื‘ืฉ ืžืกืœืข ื•ืฉืžืŸ ืžื—ืœืžื™ืฉ ืฆื•ืจืƒ

ื™ื“ ื—ืžืืช ื‘ืงืจ ื•ื—ืœื‘ ืฆืืŸ ืขื ื—ืœื‘ ื›ืจื™ื ื•ืื™ืœื™ื

ื‘ื ื™ ื‘ืฉืŸ ื•ืขืชื•ื“ื™ื ืขื ื—ืœื‘ ื›ืœื™ื•ืช ื—ื˜ื”;

ื•ื“ื ืขื ื‘ ืชืฉืชื” ื—ืžืจืƒ ื˜ื• ื•ื™ืฉืžืŸ ื™ืฉืจื•ืŸ ื•ื™ื‘ืขื˜

ืฉืžื ืช ืขื‘ื™ืช ื›ืฉื™ืช; ื•ื™ื˜ืฉ ืืœื•ึพื” ืขืฉื”ื•

ื•ื™ื ื‘ืœ ืฆื•ืจ ื™ืฉืขืชื•ืƒ ื˜ื– ื™ืงื ืื”ื• ื‘ื–ืจื™ื;

ื‘ืชื•ืขื‘ืช ื™ื›ืขื™ืกื”ื•ืƒ ื™ื– ื™ื–ื‘ื—ื• ืœืฉื“ื™ื ืœื ืืœื”

ืืœื”ื™ื ืœื ื™ื“ืขื•ื; ื—ื“ืฉื™ื ืžืงืจื‘ ื‘ืื•

ืœื ืฉืขืจื•ื ืื‘ืชื™ื›ืืƒ ื™ื— ืฆื•ืจ ื™ืœื“ืš ืชืฉื™;

ื•ืชืฉื›ื— ืืœ ืžื—ืœืœืšืƒ  

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ืœื‘

This section is pretty self-explanatory; ื”ืณ made us successful and we betrayed Him by serving idols. Ironically, Moshe calls us โ€œื™ืฉืจื•ืŸโ€, the straight ones, as we become more and more crooked. One striking thing is the idea of ืืœื”ื™ื ืœื ื™ื“ืขื•ื;ื—ื“ืฉื™ื ืžืงืจื‘ ื‘ืื•. They donโ€™t adopt the gods of the other nations; that would be at least understandable. They make up their own new gods.

ื—ื“ืฉื™ื ืžืงืจื‘ ื‘ืื•: ืืคืœื• ื”ืืžื•ืช ืœื ื”ื™ื• ืจื’ื™ืœื™ื ื‘ื”ื. ื’ื•ื™ ืฉื”ื™ื” ืจื•ืื” ืื•ืชื ื”ื™ื” ืื•ืžืจ ื–ื” ืฆืœื ื™ื”ื•ื“ื™.

ืจืฉืดื™, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ื™ื–

Israelite Idols An Israeli Antiquities Authority worker holds figurines found at the Tel Motza archaeological site: The IAA said on Wednesday they unearthed a maze-like construction and a cache of sacred vessels some 2, 750 years old.

_How idolatry continued in the Kingdom of Judah: Israeli dig uncovers temple and icons dating back to Old Testament era

But why are we so concerned about avodah zarah? It is not a problem nowadays.

However, it raises a very serious question. From the time that the exiles returned from Babylon to found the Second Commonwealth, avodah zarah ceased to be a problem for us. According to Rambanโ€™s thesis, Haโ€™azinu should have lost interest at that point. However, in his concluding remarks to Haโ€™azinu, Ramban himself states unequivocally that Haโ€™azinu takes our history all the way to Moshiachโ€™s coming.

Rav Moshe Eisemann, Shiras Haโ€™azinu, p. 154

And when the Torah talks about the dangers of success, it doesnโ€™t mention idols. Itโ€™s โ€œื›ื—ื™ ื•ืขืฆื ื™ื“ื™โ€โ€”forgetting ื”ืณ's roleโ€”that is the danger.

ื™ื‘ ืคืŸ ืชืื›ืœ ื•ืฉื‘ืขืช; ื•ื‘ืชื™ื ื˜ื‘ื™ื ืชื‘ื ื” ื•ื™ืฉื‘ืชืƒ ื™ื’ ื•ื‘ืงืจืš ื•ืฆืื ืš ื™ืจื‘ื™ืŸ ื•ื›ืกืฃ ื•ื–ื”ื‘ ื™ืจื‘ื” ืœืš; ื•ื›ืœ ืืฉืจ ืœืš ื™ืจื‘ื”ืƒ ื™ื“ ื•ืจื ืœื‘ื‘ืš; ื•ืฉื›ื—ืช ืืช ื”ืณ ืืœืงื™ืš ื”ืžื•ืฆื™ืืš ืžืืจืฅ ืžืฆืจื™ื ืžื‘ื™ืช ืขื‘ื“ื™ืืƒโ€ฆื™ื– ื•ืืžืจืช ื‘ืœื‘ื‘ืš; ื›ื—ื™ ื•ืขืฆื ื™ื“ื™ ืขืฉื” ืœื™ ืืช ื”ื—ื™ืœ ื”ื–ื”ืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ื—

Rav Eisemann says that the ืืœื”ื™ื ืœื ื™ื“ืขื•ื is much broader than just worshipping idols. The gemara describes the book of ืขื‘ื•ื“ืช ื›ื•ื›ื‘ื™ื that Avraham aggadically wrote; his magum opus of what ethical monotheism really means.

ืืดืœ ืจื‘ ื—ืกื“ื ืœืื‘ื™ืžื™: ื’ืžื™ืจื™ ื“โ€ืขื‘ื•ื“ืช ื›ื•ื›ื‘ื™ืโ€œ ื“ืื‘ืจื”ื ืื‘ื™ื ื• ื“ืณ ืžืื” ืคื™ืจืงื™ ื”ื•ื™ื™ืŸ, ื•ืื ืŸ ื—ืžืฉื” ืชื ืŸ. ื•ืœื ื™ื“ืขื™ื ืŸ ืžืื™ ืงืืžืจื™ื ืŸ.

ืขื‘ื•ื“ื” ื–ืจื” ื™ื“,ื‘

We are going to have to get used to the idea that avodah zarah is a concept that encompasses moreโ€ฆthan bowing down to graven images.

โ€ฆR. Wolbe [in ื”ืžืฆื•ื•ืช ื”ืฉืงื•ืœื•ืช] introduces us to a whole new world of what he calls ืขึฒืจึธื›ึดื™ืโ€ฆwhich we might translate as โ€œvaluesโ€: things like democracy, health, food, music, sports, visiting the sick, and myriads more, that we regard as significant aspects of our lives. He postulates that every person has an ืขืจืš ืขืœื™ื•ืŸ, a highest value, to which all his other ืขืจื›ื™ื are subordinate. In Judaism, that ืขืจืš ืขืœื™ื•ืŸ would be the Ribbono shel Olam.

[Any other value], says Rav Wolbe, would in Avraham Avinuโ€™s lexicon be considered avodah zarah. No wonder that he needed four hundred chapters!โ€ฆ

Haโ€™azinu is needed today as much as it was ever neededโ€ฆIt is true that we no longer have the urge to bow down before idols, but there are still multitudes of โ€œstrangeโ€ gods jostling for attention.

[Footnote: Rav Wolbe lists ื—ื›ืžื” among the relative ืขืจื›ื™ื that might, if we are not careful, compete for the position of ืขืจืš ืขืœื™ื•ืŸ. If I understand him correctly, he means to include even Torah learning, if that is allowed to become an end in itself, divorced from the Ribbono shel Olam].

Rav Moshe Eisemann, Shiras Haโ€™azinu, pp. 154-156

That is the danger of ืฉืžื ืช ืขื‘ื™ืช ื›ืฉื™ืช: we forget G-d. We attribute our success to all sorts of other things, and set up other things as priorities.


And the consequence is ืžื™ื“ื” ื›ื ื’ื“ ืžื™ื“ื”: G-d will forget them. This is concept of ื”ืกืชืจ ืคื ื™ื.

 ื™ื˜ ื•ื™ืจื ื”ืณ ื•ื™ื ืืฅ

ืžื›ืขืก ื‘ื ื™ื• ื•ื‘ื ืชื™ื•ืƒ ื› ื•ื™ืืžืจ ืืกืชื™ืจื” ืคื ื™ ืžื”ื

ืืจืื” ืžื” ืื—ืจื™ืชื; ื›ื™ ื“ื•ืจ ืชื”ืคื›ืช ื”ืžื”

ื‘ื ื™ื ืœื ืืžืŸ ื‘ืืƒ ื›ื ื”ื ืงื ืื•ื ื™ ื‘ืœื ืืœ

ื›ืขืกื•ื ื™ ื‘ื”ื‘ืœื™ื”ื; ื•ืื ื™ ืืงื ื™ืื ื‘ืœื ืขื

ื‘ื’ื•ื™ ื ื‘ืœ ืื›ืขื™ืกืืƒ ื›ื‘ ื›ื™ ืืฉ ืงื“ื—ื” ื‘ืืคื™

ื•ืชื™ืงื“ ืขื“ ืฉืื•ืœ ืชื—ืชื™ืช; ื•ืชืื›ืœ ืืจืฅ ื•ื™ื‘ืœื”

ื•ืชืœื”ื˜ ืžื•ืกื“ื™ ื”ืจื™ืืƒ ื›ื’ ืืกืคื” ืขืœื™ืžื• ืจืขื•ืช;

ื—ืฆื™ ืื›ืœื” ื‘ืืƒ ื›ื“ ืžื–ื™ ืจืขื‘ ื•ืœื—ืžื™ ืจืฉืฃ

ื•ืงื˜ื‘ ืžืจื™ืจื™; ื•ืฉืŸ ื‘ื”ืžืช ืืฉืœื— ื‘ื

ืขื ื—ืžืช ื–ื—ืœื™ ืขืคืจืƒ ื›ื” ืžื—ื•ืฅ ืชืฉื›ืœ ื—ืจื‘ ื•ืžื—ื“ืจื™ื ืื™ืžื”; ื’ื ื‘ื—ื•ืจ

ื’ื ื‘ืชื•ืœื” ื™ื•ื ืง ืขื ืื™ืฉ ืฉื™ื‘ื”ืƒ ื›ื• ืืžืจืชื™ ืืคืื™ื”ื;

ืืฉื‘ื™ืชื” ืžืื ื•ืฉ ื–ื›ืจืืƒ ื›ื– ืœื•ืœื™ ื›ืขืก ืื•ื™ื‘ ืื’ื•ืจ

ืคืŸ ื™ื ื›ืจื• ืฆืจื™ืžื•; ืคืŸ ื™ืืžืจื• ื™ื“ื ื• ืจืžื”

ื•ืœื ื”ืณ ืคืขืœ ื›ืœ ื–ืืชืƒ ื›ื— ื›ื™ ื’ื•ื™ ืื‘ื“ ืขืฆื•ืช ื”ืžื”;

ื•ืื™ืŸ ื‘ื”ื ืชื‘ื•ื ื”ืƒ  

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ืœื‘

ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ are a ื“ื•ืจ ืชื”ืคื›ืช, a topsy-turvy generation.

Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backwardโ€”reversing cause and effect. I call these the โ€œwet streets cause rainโ€ stories. Paperโ€™s full of them.

Michael Crichton, Why Speculate?

Yirmiyahu has an example of just that:

ื˜ื• ื•ื™ืขื ื• ืืช ื™ืจืžื™ื”ื• ื›ืœ ื”ืื ืฉื™ื ื”ื™ื“ืขื™ื ื›ื™ ืžืงื˜ืจื•ืช ื ืฉื™ื”ื ืœืืœื”ื™ื ืื—ืจื™ื ื•ื›ืœ ื”ื ืฉื™ื ื”ืขืžื“ื•ืช ืงื”ืœ ื’ื“ื•ืœ; ื•ื›ืœ ื”ืขื ื”ื™ืฉื‘ื™ื ื‘ืืจืฅ ืžืฆืจื™ื ื‘ืคืชืจื•ืก ืœืืžืจืƒ ื˜ื– ื”ื“ื‘ืจ ืืฉืจ ื“ื‘ืจืช ืืœื™ื ื• ื‘ืฉื ื”ืณ ืื™ื ื ื• ืฉืžืขื™ื ืืœื™ืšืƒ ื™ื– ื›ื™ ืขืฉื” ื ืขืฉื” ืืช ื›ืœ ื”ื“ื‘ืจ ืืฉืจ ื™ืฆื ืžืคื™ื ื• ืœืงื˜ืจ ืœืžืœื›ืช ื”ืฉืžื™ื ื•ื”ืกื™ืš ืœื” ื ืกื›ื™ื ื›ืืฉืจ ืขืฉื™ื ื• ืื ื—ื ื• ื•ืื‘ืชื™ื ื• ืžืœื›ื™ื ื• ื•ืฉืจื™ื ื• ื‘ืขืจื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื•ื‘ื—ืฆื•ืช ื™ืจื•ืฉืœื; ื•ื ืฉื‘ืข ืœื—ื ื•ื ื”ื™ื” ื˜ื•ื‘ื™ื ื•ืจืขื” ืœื ืจืื™ื ื•ืƒ ื™ื— ื•ืžืŸ ืื– ื—ื“ืœื ื• ืœืงื˜ืจ ืœืžืœื›ืช ื”ืฉืžื™ื ื•ื”ืกืš ืœื” ื ืกื›ื™ื ื—ืกืจื ื• ื›ืœ; ื•ื‘ื—ืจื‘ ื•ื‘ืจืขื‘ ืชืžื ื•ืƒโ€ฆ

ื› ื•ื™ืืžืจ ื™ืจืžื™ื”ื• ืืœ ื›ืœ ื”ืขื ืขืœ ื”ื’ื‘ืจื™ื ื•ืขืœ ื”ื ืฉื™ื ื•ืขืœ ื›ืœ ื”ืขื ื”ืขื ื™ื ืืชื• ื“ื‘ืจ ืœืืžืจืƒ ื›ื ื”ืœื•ื ืืช ื”ืงื˜ืจ ืืฉืจ ืงื˜ืจืชื ื‘ืขืจื™ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื•ื‘ื—ืฆื•ืช ื™ืจื•ืฉืœื ืืชื ื•ืื‘ื•ืชื™ื›ื ืžืœื›ื™ื›ื ื•ืฉืจื™ื›ื ื•ืขื ื”ืืจืฅ; ืืชื ื–ื›ืจ ื”ืณ ื•ืชืขืœื” ืขืœ ืœื‘ื•ืƒ ื›ื‘ ื•ืœื ื™ื•ื›ืœ ื”ืณ ืขื•ื“ ืœืฉืืช ืžืคื ื™ ืจืข ืžืขืœืœื™ื›ื ืžืคื ื™ ื”ืชื•ืขื‘ืช ืืฉืจ ืขืฉื™ืชื; ื•ืชื”ื™ ืืจืฆื›ื ืœื—ืจื‘ื” ื•ืœืฉืžื” ื•ืœืงืœืœื” ืžืื™ืŸ ื™ื•ืฉื‘ ื›ื”ื™ื•ื ื”ื–ื”ืƒ ื›ื’ ืžืคื ื™ ืืฉืจ ืงื˜ืจืชื ื•ืืฉืจ ื—ื˜ืืชื ืœื”ืณ ื•ืœื ืฉืžืขืชื ื‘ืงื•ืœ ื”ืณ ื•ื‘ืชืจืชื• ื•ื‘ื—ืงืชื™ื• ื•ื‘ืขื“ื•ืชื™ื• ืœื ื”ืœื›ืชื; ืขืœ ื›ืŸ ืงืจืืช ืืชื›ื ื”ืจืขื” ื”ื–ืืช ื›ื™ื•ื ื”ื–ื”ืƒ

ื™ืจืžื™ื”ื• ืคืจืง ืžื“

And so when ื”ืณ punishes us, He simply removes the protection that we talked about in ืชื”ื™ืœื™ื ืคืจืง ืฆื, in Three Score and Ten:

ื” ืœื ืชื™ืจื ืžืคื—ื“ ืœื™ืœื”; ืžื—ืฅ ื™ืขื•ืฃ ื™ื•ืžืืƒ ื• ืžื“ื‘ืจ ื‘ืืคืœ ื™ื”ืœืš; ืžืงื˜ื‘ ื™ืฉื•ื“ ืฆื”ืจื™ืืƒ

ืชื”ื™ืœื™ื ืคืจืง ืฆื

And now we will have to be afraid of ืžื–ื™ ืจืขื‘ ื•ืœื—ืžื™ ืจืฉืฃ.

ื”ืณ threatens ืืžืจืชื™ ืืคืื™ื”ื; โ€I thought about this concept of ืืคืื™ื”ืโ€œ. There is a lot of discussion about what that means. It could come from ืืฃ, anger:

ืืžืจืชื™ ืืคืื™ื”ื: ืคื™ืจื•ืฉ ืืคืื™ื”ื ืืกืžื™ืš ืืคื™ ืขืžื”ื ืขื“ ืฉื™ื•ืฉื‘ืชื• ืžืื ื•ืฉ.

ืื•ืจ ื”ื—ื™ื™ื, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ื›ื•

Or it could refer to ืคืื”, the corner. I will destroy them, leaving only a tiny remnant (like the ืžืฆื•ื•ื” of ืคืื”):

ืืžืจืชื™ ืืคืื™ื”ื: ืฉืืฉืื™ืจ ืžื”ื ืจืง ืคืืช ื”ืื•ืžื” ื”ืžื” ืžื•ืงืฆื” ืฉื‘ืขื. ืื• ืืฉื‘ื™ืชื” ืžืื ื•ืฉ ื–ื›ืจื.

ื”ืขืžืง ื“ื‘ืจ, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ื›ื•

Or I will destroy even the ืคืื”:

ืืžืจืชื™ ืืคืื™ื”ื: ืื›ืœื” ื’ื ื”ืคื™ืื” ืฉืœื ืœื”ื ื™ื— ืžื”ื ืคื™ืื”.

ื—ื–ืงื•ื ื™, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ื›ื•

Or I will scatter them to the far corners of the earth:

ืืคืื™ื”ื: ืืžืจื• ื”ืžื“ืงื“ืงื™ื ืืคื–ืจื ื‘ื›ืœ ืคืื”.

ืจืžื‘ืดืŸ, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ื›ื•

I would assume the ambiguity is intentional; there are many possible end points for the history of ื‘ื ื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ, all bad, all ending up with the people disappearing from the stage of world history.

In the opinion of Mr. Toynbee, Jewish history, as well as the history of Judaism, came to an end in 69-70 C.E., when the Roman legions destroyed Jerusalem and the Jewish people were scattered over the face of the earthโ€ฆAs to the Jewry that has survived to this day, the most pleasant thing he can say is that it is โ€œthe debrisโ€ of a โ€œdevoted Syriac people,โ€ which existed once upon a time; that it represents nothing more than โ€œa pulverized social ash.โ€

Eliezer Berkovits, [Judaism; Fossil or Ferment], IV:1, citing Arnold J. Toynbeeโ€™s A Study of History, II:286

But ื”ืณ wonโ€™t let this happen, not because the Jews are so wonderful, but because without them, because the world wonโ€™t get the message: ืœื•ืœื™ ื›ืขืก ืื•ื™ื‘ ืื’ื•ืจ ืคืŸ ื™ื ื›ืจื• ืฆืจื™ืžื•; ืคืŸ ื™ืืžืจื• ื™ื“ื ื• ืจืžื” ื•ืœื ื”ืณ ืคืขืœ ื›ืœ ื–ืืช.

ื›ื™ ื’ื•ื™ ืื•ื‘ื“ ืขืฆื•ืช: ื”ื ื›ื•ืŸ ืฉื–ื” ื”ื’ื•ื™ ื”ื ืฆืจื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ.

ืื‘ืŸ ืขื–ืจื, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ื›ื—

It is similar to Mosheโ€™s argument when he prays after ื—ื˜ื ืขื’ืœ ื”ื–ื”ื‘:

ื™ื ื•ื™ื—ืœ ืžืฉื” ืืช ืคื ื™ ื”ืณ ืืœืงื™ื•; ื•ื™ืืžืจ ืœืžื” ื”ืณ ื™ื—ืจื” ืืคืš ื‘ืขืžืš ืืฉืจ ื”ื•ืฆืืช ืžืืจืฅ ืžืฆืจื™ื ื‘ื›ื— ื’ื“ื•ืœ ื•ื‘ื™ื“ ื—ื–ืงื”ืƒ ื™ื‘ ืœืžื” ื™ืืžืจื• ืžืฆืจื™ื ืœืืžืจ ื‘ืจืขื” ื”ื•ืฆื™ืื ืœื”ืจื’ ืืชื ื‘ื”ืจื™ื ื•ืœื›ืœืชื ืžืขืœ ืคื ื™ ื”ืื“ืžื”; ืฉื•ื‘ ืžื—ืจื•ืŸ ืืคืš ื•ื”ื ื—ื ืขืœ ื”ืจืขื” ืœืขืžืšืƒ

ืฉืžื•ืช ืคืจืง ืœื‘

And Yechezkelโ€™s vision of the ultimate redemption:

ื›ื ื•ื™ืžืจื• ื‘ื™ ื”ื‘ื ื™ื ื‘ื—ืงื•ืชื™ ืœื ื”ืœื›ื• ื•ืืช ืžืฉืคื˜ื™ ืœื ืฉืžืจื• ืœืขืฉื•ืช ืื•ืชื ืืฉืจ ื™ืขืฉื” ืื•ืชื ื”ืื“ื ื•ื—ื™ ื‘ื”ื ืืช ืฉื‘ืชื•ืชื™ ื—ืœืœื•; ื•ืืžืจ ืœืฉืคืš ื—ืžืชื™ ืขืœื™ื”ื ืœื›ืœื•ืช ืืคื™ ื‘ื ื‘ืžื“ื‘ืจืƒ ื›ื‘ ื•ื”ืฉื‘ืชื™ ืืช ื™ื“ื™ ื•ืืขืฉ ืœืžืขืŸ ืฉืžื™ ืœื‘ืœืชื™ ื”ื—ืœ ืœืขื™ื ื™ ื”ื’ื•ื™ื ืืฉืจ ื”ื•ืฆืืชื™ ืื•ืชื ืœืขื™ื ื™ื”ืืƒ

โ€ฆืžื“ ื•ื™ื“ืขืชื ื›ื™ ืื ื™ ื”ืณ ื‘ืขืฉื•ืชื™ ืืชื›ื ืœืžืขืŸ ืฉืžื™; ืœื ื›ื“ืจื›ื™ื›ื ื”ืจืขื™ื ื•ื›ืขืœื™ืœื•ืชื™ื›ื ื”ื ืฉื—ืชื•ืช ื‘ื™ืช ื™ืฉืจืืœ ื ืื ืื“ื ื™ ื”ืณืƒ

ื™ื—ื–ืงืืœ ืคืจืง ื›

Ramban makes the point that we canโ€™t rely on our merits, and we canโ€™t rely on the merits of our ancestors either:

ืืฉื‘ื™ืชื” ืžืื ื•ืฉ ื–ื›ืจื: ื’ืœื•ืชื ื• ื‘ื™ืŸ ื”ืขืžื™ื ืื ื—ื ื• ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื•ื‘ื ื™ืžื™ืŸ ืฉืื™ืŸ ืœื ื• ื–ื›ืจ ื‘ืขืžื™ื ื•ืœื ื ื—ืฉื‘ ืœืขื ื•ืื•ืžื” ื›ืœืœ ื•ื”ื ื” ื™ืืžืจ ื”ื›ืชื•ื‘ ื›ื™ ื”ื™ื” ื‘ืžื“ืช ื”ื“ื™ืŸ ืœื”ื™ื•ืชื ื• ื›ืŸ ื‘ื’ืœื•ืช ืœืขื•ืœื ืœื•ืœื™ ื›ืขืก ืื•ื™ื‘ ื•ื™ื•ืจื” ื–ื” ื›ื™ ื‘ื’ืœื•ืชื ื• ืขืชื” ืชืžื” ื–ื›ื•ืช ืื‘ื•ืช ื•ืื™ืŸ ืœื ื• ื”ืฆืœื” ืžื™ื“ ื”ืขืžื™ื ืจืง ื‘ืขื‘ื•ืจ ืฉืžื• ื”ื’ื“ื•ืœ ื™ืชืณ ื›ืขื ื™ืŸ ืฉืืžืจ ื‘ื™ื—ื–ืงืืœ.

ืจืžื‘ืดืŸ, ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื‘:ื›ื•

What does that mean, ืชืžื” ื–ื›ื•ืช ืื‘ื•ืช?

ื•ื™ืืžืจ ื”ืณ ืึตืœึธื• ืขื‘ืจ ื‘ืชื•ืš ื”ืขื™ืจ ื‘ืชื•ืš ื™ืจื•ืฉืœื; ื•ื”ืชื•ื™ืช ืชื• ืขืœ ืžืฆื—ื•ืช ื”ืื ืฉื™ื ื”ื ืื ื—ื™ื ื•ื”ื ืื ืงื™ื ืขืœ ื›ืœ ื”ืชื•ืขื‘ื•ืช ื”ื ืขืฉื•ืช ื‘ืชื•ื›ื”ืƒ

ื™ื—ื–ืงืืœ ื˜ืƒื“

ื•ืžืื™ ืฉื ื โ€ืชื™ื•โ€œ?โ€ฆืฉืžื•ืืœ ืืžืจ: ืชืžื” ื–ื›ื•ืช ืื‘ื•ืช.

ืฉื‘ืช ื ื”,ื

ื›ื‘ืจ ื‘ื™ืืจื ื• ื‘ืžืงื•ื ืื—ืจ ืฉื’ื“ืจ ื–ื›ื•ืช ืื‘ื•ืช ืฉื–ึทื›ึผื•ึผืช (ื–ืณ ืคืชื•ื—ื”) ื”ืื‘ื•ืช ื•ื”ืชื—ืกื“ื•ืชื ื”ื˜ื”ื•ืจื” ืžืชืคืฉื˜ื•ืช ืืœ ื ืคืฉื•ืช ื‘ื ื™ื”ื ืื—ืจื™ื”ื, ื‘ืื•ืคืŸ ืฉื’ื ื‘ื—ื˜ืื ืขื“ื™ื™ืŸ ื™ืฉ ืœื”ื ืฉื™ื™ื›ื•ืช ืœื—ืกื“ื™ ืื‘ื•ืช, ื•ื‘ื–ื” ื–ื•ื›ื™ื ื”ื ืœื”ืžืฉืš ื”ืจื—ืžื™ื ื•ืกื™ื™ืขืชื ื“ืฉืžื™ื, ื›ื™ ื™ืฉ ืขื“ื™ื™ืŸ ืชืงื•ื” ืœืชืงื•ื ื.

ืžื›ืชื‘ ืžืืœื™ื”ื•, ื‘:278, ื“ื•ื“ ื”ืžืœืš ื•ื‘ื ื™ืŸ ื‘ื™ืช ื”ืžืงื“ืฉ

We now understand why Ramban needed to preface his remarks to the second half of verse 26 with his assessment that this would happen only when ืชืžื” ื–ื›ื•ืช ืื‘ื•ืช. [T]his would be at a point in history when the promise that the Ribono shel Olam had made to Avraham at the time of the Akeidah [(ืจืžื‘ืดืŸ, ื‘ืจืืฉื™ืช ื›ื‘:16)โ€Ž ื™ืขืŸ ืืฉืจ ืขืฉื™ืช ื”ืžืขืฉื” ื”ื’ื“ื•ืœ ื”ื–ื” ืฉื ืฉื‘ืข ื‘ืฉืžื• ื”ื’ื“ื•ืœ ื•ืฉื™ื™ืจืฉ ื–ืจืขื• ืืช ืฉืขืจ ืื•ื™ื‘ื™ื• ื•ื”ื ื” ื”ื•ื‘ื˜ื— ืฉืœื ื™ื’ืจื•ื ืฉื•ื ื—ื˜ื ืฉื™ื›ืœื” ื–ืจืขื• ืื• ืฉื™ืคื•ืœ ื‘ื™ื“ ืื•ื™ื‘ื™ื• ื•ืœื ื™ืงื•ื ื•ื”ื ื” ื–ื• ื”ื‘ื˜ื—ื” ืฉืœื™ืžื” ื‘ื’ืื•ืœื” ื”ืขืชื™ื“ื” ืœื ื•] would no longer be effective. That promise had been predicated upon the assumption that we would still be considered to be ื–ืจืขืš, (Avrahamโ€™s) offspring.

Rav Moshe Eisemann, Shiras Haโ€™azinu, p. 99

So at the point of ื•ื™ืฉืžืŸ ื™ืฉืจื•ืŸ ื•ื™ื‘ืขื˜, we have lost the right to be called (ื™ืฉืขื™ื”ื• ืžื:ื—)โ€Ž ื–ืจืข ืื‘ืจื”ื ืื”ื‘ื™, and terrible things happen to us, but we are kept around to be a lesson to the world.


Then Moshe describes how foolish the nation is for not realizing that ื”ืณ's hand was behind everything that happens, both the victories and the losses:

  ื›ื˜ ืœื• ื—ื›ืžื• ื™ืฉื›ื™ืœื• ื–ืืช;

ื™ื‘ื™ื ื• ืœืื—ืจื™ืชืืƒ ืœ ืื™ื›ื” ื™ืจื“ืฃ ืื—ื“ ืืœืฃ

ื•ืฉื ื™ื ื™ื ื™ืกื• ืจื‘ื‘ื”; ืื ืœื ื›ื™ ืฆื•ืจื ืžื›ืจื

ื•ื”ืณ ื”ืกื’ื™ืจืืƒ ืœื ื›ื™ ืœื ื›ืฆื•ืจื ื• ืฆื•ืจื;

ื•ืื™ื‘ื™ื ื• ืคืœื™ืœื™ืืƒ ืœื‘ ื›ื™ ืžื’ืคืŸ ืกื“ื ื’ืคื ื

ื•ืžืฉื“ืžืช ืขืžืจื”; ืขื ื‘ืžื• ืขื ื‘ื™ ืจื•ืฉ

ืืฉื›ืœืช ืžืจืจืช ืœืžื•ืƒ ืœื’ ื—ืžืช ืชื ื™ื ื ื™ื™ื ื;

ื•ืจืืฉ ืคืชื ื™ื ืื›ื–ืจืƒ ืœื“ ื”ืœื ื”ื•ื ื›ืžืก ืขืžื“ื™;

ื—ืชื•ื ื‘ืื•ืฆืจืชื™ืƒ  

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ืœื‘

This part of Haazinu is ambiguous. Who are these ignorant people, ืœื• ื—ื›ืžื• ื™ืฉื›ื™ืœื• ื–ืืช?

ื›ื™ ื’ื•ื™ ืื•ื‘ื“ ืขืฆื•ืช ื”ืžื”: ืจืณ ื™ื”ื•ื“ื” ื“ื•ืจืฉื ื›ืœืคื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ, ืจืณ ื ื—ืžื™ื” ื“ื•ืจืฉื ื›ืœืคื™ ื”ืื•ืžื•ืช.

ืกืคืจื™ ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืฉื›ืดื‘

The ambiguityโ€ฆis, of course, deliberate. There can be no more devasting judgment of the level to which we had sunk than this. We have reached a point at which there is no longer any way to tell whether it is โ€œweโ€ or โ€œtheyโ€ who is being described. So much for our segulah standing!

Rav Moshe Eisemann, Shiras Haโ€™azinu, p. 81

The creatures outside looked from pig to man, and from man to pig, and from pig to man again; but already it was impossible to say which was which.

George Orwell, Animal Farm, last line

Animal Farm ends there. But Haazinu continues with ื”ืณโ€™s response. He will make them drink the wine of their own deeds, a metaphor that comes up in ืชื ืดืš often:

ื”ืชืขื•ืจืจื™ ื”ืชืขื•ืจืจื™ ืงื•ืžื™ ื™ืจื•ืฉืœื ืืฉืจ ืฉืชื™ืช ืžื™ื“ ื”ืณ ืืช ื›ื•ืก ื—ืžืชื•; ืืช ืงื‘ืขืช ื›ื•ืก ื”ืชืจืขืœื” ืฉืชื™ืช ืžืฆื™ืชืƒ

ื™ืฉืขื™ื”ื• ื ื:ื™ื–

In ื™ืฉืขื™ื” it is clearly Israel that is drinking the poison of ื”ืณโ€™s anger; in ื™ืจืžื™ื”ื• it refers to the enemies of Israel.

ื›ื™ ื›ื” ืืžืจ ื”ืณ ืืœืงื™ ื™ืฉืจืืœ ืืœื™ ืงื— ืืช ื›ื•ืก ื”ื™ื™ืŸ ื”ื—ืžื” ื”ื–ืืช ืžื™ื“ื™; ื•ื”ืฉืงื™ืชื” ืืชื• ืืช ื›ืœ ื”ื’ื•ื™ื ืืฉืจ ืื ื›ื™ ืฉืœื— ืื•ืชืš ืืœื™ื”ืืƒ

ื™ืจืžื™ื”ื• ื›ื”:ื˜ื•

Here the text remains ambiguous. Both interpretations are true. However, the second half of our aliyah unambiguously turns to the salvation of Israel.

 ืœื” ืœื™ ื ืงื ื•ืฉืœื

ืœืขืช ืชืžื•ื˜ ืจื’ืœื; ื›ื™ ืงืจื•ื‘ ื™ื•ื ืื™ื“ื

ื•ื—ืฉ ืขืชื“ืช ืœืžื•ืƒ ืœื• ื›ื™ ื™ื“ื™ืŸ ื”ืณ ืขืžื•

ื•ืขืœ ืขื‘ื“ื™ื• ื™ืชื ื—ื; ื›ื™ ื™ืจืื” ื›ื™ ืื–ืœืช ื™ื“

ื•ืืคืก ืขืฆื•ืจ ื•ืขื–ื•ื‘ืƒ ืœื– ื•ืืžืจ ืื™ ืืœื”ื™ืžื•

ืฆื•ืจ ื—ืกื™ื• ื‘ื•ืƒ ืœื— ืืฉืจ ื—ืœื‘ ื–ื‘ื—ื™ืžื• ื™ืื›ืœื•

ื™ืฉืชื• ื™ื™ืŸ ื ืกื™ื›ื; ื™ืงื•ืžื• ื•ื™ืขื–ืจื›ื

ื™ื”ื™ ืขืœื™ื›ื ืกืชืจื”ืƒ ืœื˜ ืจืื• ืขืชื” ื›ื™ ืื ื™ ืื ื™ ื”ื•ื

ื•ืื™ืŸ ืืœื”ื™ื ืขืžื“ื™; ืื ื™ ืืžื™ืช ื•ืื—ื™ื”

ืžื—ืฆืชื™ ื•ืื ื™ ืืจืคื ื•ืื™ืŸ ืžื™ื“ื™ ืžืฆื™ืœืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ืœื‘

Now this is a glorious song; this is a ืฉื™ืจ:

ื•ื™ื“ื‘ืจ ืžืฉื” ื‘ืื–ื ื™ ื›ืœ ืงื”ืœ ื™ืฉืจืืœ ืืช ื“ื‘ืจื™ ื”ืฉื™ืจื” ื”ื–ืืช ืขื“ ืชืžืืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื:ืœ

Rabbi Shulman has talked about the nature of shir in ืชื ืดืš as specifically referring to a victory song. It is a โ€œgoodโ€ ืฉื™ืจ if it attributes victory to ื”ืงื‘ืดื”, and a โ€œbadโ€ ืฉื™ืจ that leads to terrible consequences if human being celebrate their own glory. So this is a good ืฉื™ืจ. But Rabbi Eisemann points out a problem with Haazinu as ืฉื™ืจ:

(ืชื”ืœื™ื ื™ื’:ื•) ื•ืื ื™ ื‘ื—ืกื“ืš ื‘ื˜ื—ืชื™ ื™ื’ืœ ืœื‘ื™ ื‘ื™ืฉื•ืขืชืš ืืฉื™ืจื” ืœื”ืณ ื›ื™ ื’ืžืœ ืขืœื™: ื•ื‘ืฉื ื”ื’ืจืดื—. ื“ื™ืฉ ืœืขื™ื™ืŸ ืžืžืชื™ ืืคืฉืจ ืœื•ืžืจ ืฉื™ืจื” ืขืœ ื”ื ืก, ื”ืื ืจืง ืื—ืจ ืฉืงืจื” ื›ื‘ืจ ื”ื ืก, ืื• ื’ื ืื ื™ื”ื ืœื‘ื• ื‘ื˜ื•ื— ืฉื™ืงืจื” ื ืก. ื•ื›ื’ื•ืŸ ืฉื ื‘ื™ื ืฉื™ืืžืจ ืœื• ื›ืŸ, ื™ื›ื•ืœ ื›ื‘ืจ ืœื•ืžืจ ืฉื™ืจื” ืขืœ ื”ื ืก? ื•ื–ื”ื• ื“ืžื‘ื•ืืจ ื‘ืคืกื•ืง ื”ื ืดืœ โ€ื•ืื ื™ ื‘ื—ืกื“ืš ื‘ื˜ื—ืชื™โ€œ ื”ื™ื™ื ื• ื“ื‘ื˜ื•ื— ืจืง ื‘ื—ืกื“ืš ืื–ื™ ืจืง โ€ื™ื’ืœ ืœื‘ื™ ื‘ื™ืฉื•ืขืชืš"; ื™ืฉ ืœื™ ืฉืžื—ื” ืขืดื–. ืื‘ืœ ืžืชื™ โ€ืืฉื™ืจื” ืœื”ืณโ€œ, ื“ืื•ืžืจ ืฉื™ืจื”? ื”ื•ื ืจืง โ€ื›ื™ ื’ืžืœ ืขืœื™โ€œ, ื›ืฉืงื•ืจื” ื•ื ื”ื™ื” ื”ื ืก ื›ื‘ืจ.

ื”ืจื‘ ื™ืฆื—ืง ื–ืื‘ ื”ืœื•ื™ ืกื•ืœื•ื‘ื™ื™ืฆืณื™ืง, ืžื•ื‘ื ื‘ึพRav Moshe Eisemann, Shiras Haโ€™azinu, p. 150

If this is a ืฉื™ืจ, then we should only sing it after the victory. How can we sing this ืฉื™ืจ now, when we hope and pray for ืœื™ ื ืงื ื•ืฉืœื but it hasnโ€™t happened yet? The answer is that Haazinu is not a ืฉื™ืจ about the ultimate victory over our enemies; that is a ืฉื™ืจ for the future.

ืืžืจื• ืœื• ื™ืฉืจืืœ ืขืฉืจ ืฉื™ืจื•ืชโ€ฆืจื‘ื™ืขื™ืช ืืžืจ ืžืฉื” (ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืœื:ื›ื“): ื•ึทื™ึฐื”ึดื™โ€‰ ื›ึผึฐื›ึทืœึผื•ึนืช ืžึนืฉืึถื” ืœึดื›ึฐืชึผึนื‘ ื•ื’ื•ืณ โ€ฆื”ืขืฉื™ืจื™ืช ืœืขืชื™ื“ (ืชื”ืœื™ื ืฆื—:ื) ืžึดื–ึฐืžื•ึนืจ ืฉืึดื™ืจื•ึผ ืœึทื”ืณ ืฉืึดื™ืจ ื—ึธื“ึธืฉื ื›ึผึดื™ ื ึดืคึฐืœึธืื•ึนืช ืขึธืฉื‚ึธื”.

ืžื“ืจืฉ ืชื ื—ื•ืžื, ื‘ืฉืœื— ื™

This is a ืฉื™ืจ about ืืกืชื™ืจื” ืคื ื™ ืžื”ื. Even in the most terrible times, ื”ืณ is still with us, just โ€œhiddenโ€.

โ€œโ€ฆIt is true that My face is hidden, but it is โ€˜Iโ€™, present among you as always, Who is doing the hidingโ€.

That, R. Bunim from Peshischa preached, is the message that Haazinu teaches us. We sing even when we are the victims of G-ds anger, because as long as He is with us, we feel safe and cared for in His arms.

In verse 39, Haazinu calls out to us, ืจืื• ืขืชื” ื›ื™ ืื ื™ ืื ื™ ื”ื•ื, โ€See now that it is I, even I Who am Heโ€œ. โ€œIโ€ is first person; it implies a presence, we use โ€œheโ€ when we talk about a third person who is not in front of us. โ€œPlease understand,โ€ God is calling out to us, โ€œthat even when you experience Me as โ€˜Heโ€™ it is really โ€˜Iโ€™ Who am there at your sideโ€.

There is much to sing about even when we suffer.

Rav Gedaliah Schorr, [Ohr Gedalyahu], as translated by Rav Moshe Eisemann, Shiras Haโ€™azinu, p. 18

And the song concludes on a positive (though gory) note:

ืž ื›ื™ ืืฉื ืืœ ืฉืžื™ื ื™ื“ื™; ื•ืืžืจืชื™ ื—ื™ ืื ื›ื™ ืœืขืœืืƒ

ืžื ืื ืฉื ื•ืชื™ ื‘ืจืง ื—ืจื‘ื™ ื•ืชืื—ื– ื‘ืžืฉืคื˜ ื™ื“ื™;

ืืฉื™ื‘ ื ืงื ืœืฆืจื™ ื•ืœืžืฉื ืื™ ืืฉืœืืƒ

ืžื‘ ืืฉื›ื™ืจ ื—ืฆื™ ืžื“ื ื•ื—ืจื‘ื™ ืชืื›ืœ ื‘ืฉืจ;

ืžื“ื ื—ืœืœ ื•ืฉื‘ื™ื” ืžืจืืฉ ืคืจืขื•ืช ืื•ื™ื‘ืƒ

ืžื’ ื”ืจื ื™ื ื• ื’ื•ื™ื ืขืžื• ื›ื™ ื“ื ืขื‘ื“ื™ื• ื™ืงื•ื;

ื•ื ืงื ื™ืฉื™ื‘ ืœืฆืจื™ื• ื•ื›ืคืจ ืื“ืžืชื• ืขืžื•ืƒ

ื“ื‘ืจื™ื ืคืจืง ืœื‘

Despite all our failings, ื”ืณ will forgive us and save us, and return us to our land: ื•ื›ืคืจ ืื“ืžืชื• ืขืžื•.